Special Alert Newsletter - April 2010
To subscribe: e-mail Des Griffin at alert@midnightmessenger.com
 Dear Friends:
Are we being “set up” for another 9/11-type event? Although there are many reasons why another such “catastrophic and catalyzing event” would appear — at first glance — very remote, it is in fact well within the realm of possibility.
One has only to remember the scenario that led up to President Bush’s unprovoked declarations of war against the sovereign states of Iraq and Afghanistan. to see their close similarity to the propaganda with which we are being currently bombarded with regard to the “threat” allegedly posed by Iran. Many will remember the almost 24/7 bombardment of false propaganda and outright lies that rained down on the American public in order to “justify” America’s upcoming attacks on Iraq and Afghanistan.
Of course, we now know that the invasion of Iraq and the ouster of Saddam Hussein had been plotted and planned years before it actually happened. It was the brainchild of the Project for the New American Century, a neo-congroup which had been working on the project since at least 1996 — five long years prior to George Bush taking office.
How about another 9/1-type event? Such a occurrence could unfold in a number of ways: A collapse of the unconstitutional fiat money system? One or more “suitcase-sized” atomic bombs exploded in key American cities? Widespread HAARP-generated weather catastrophes that threaten to disrupt society and imperil our food supply? Or...........
Recently, we read a thought-provoking article by Barry Chamish, a Canadian/Israeli writer and investigative reporter. He was reviewing a book titled Political Ponerology written by “a self-claimed Polish refugee in America, Andrew Lobaczewski... Ponerology is a term invented by the author and it means the study of the nature of political evil... The author believes that psychopaths are driven ... to take over governments and make whole nations and societies evil. We all know, or should know, psychopaths. They are manipulative, mostly men who totally lack empathy for other people. Though they have learned to appear normal, that is merely a survival tactic. They lie without conscience, they hurt others because they do not care for them, they foment division in all human relationships, and they justify complete selfishness because they feel superior to the adjusted world. When caught in misdoing, they put the hurt party on the defensive with false justifications. When they manage to achieve political power, they can and do murder without remorse because they don’t feel the pain of humanity.”
That is a fair analysis of many of the “movers and shakers” in today’s sick society. People who are psychopaths or have psychopathic tendencies come in all shapes and sizes, and are found in all levels of society — political, business, education, and religion. The bottom line, whether recognized or not, is that for one reason or another such people have fallen hook, line, and sinker for the Satanic lie that they can be “as gods” (Genesis 3:5). Individuals living in such a delusional fantasy world are dangerous. When in positions of power and collectivized, as appears to presently be the case worldwide, they represent a mighty engine of mass destruction.
Generally speaking, most people are incapable of recognizing these deadly individuals, and the affects they have on society. As someone wrote recently, the task of conveying to people the truth about what is really happening on the world stage “is reminiscent of the legendary Labors of Hercules. Supplying information which people just happen to lack is generally quite easy. Far more difficult is the task of conveying truth to minds already oversupplied with falsehood, minds that have been rigorously conditioned by 20 years or more of propaganda and pressure, minds mostly closed to further instruction.”
CHANGE AGENTS
Few consciously recognize that — from every point of the compass — they and society at large are under attack 24/7. Those attacks manifest themselves in a wide variety of ways, but are all designed to manipulate us, particularly groups, into going along with carefully-thought-out agendas. These agendas — without, of course, the knowledge of those under attack — are employed to manipulate or coerce the targets of the attack into unwittingly going along with some undeclared and thus unrecognized plan.
These methods have, for decades, been used to great effect by those who control what was once known as the American educational system, but which has long-since degenerated into a highly organized, devastatingly effective, taxpayer-funded, or fifth column, brainwashing operation. The dictionary definition of a fifth column is, “A clandestine organization working within a country to further an invading army’s ... political aims.”
Of course, the fifth columnists who control the brain laundries euphemistically called “schools” want to divert parents’ attention from what it really happening. Frequently complaining about lack of parental involvement in their children’s “education,” they ask parents to “volunteer” time to help teachers ease their work load. As Beverly Eakman points out in her book Educating For the New World Order, this is done to create a perception of participation, or preserve the illusion that there is “lay, or community, participation in the decision-making process, while in fact lay citizens are been squeezed out” of the educational process.
At meetings attended by parents, what is known as the “Alinsky Method” is used to “squeeze out” ideas or people not compatible with the hidden agenda. This method, which was used very successfully by Barack Obama during his presidential campaign, is founded on the belief that, having “the herd instinct,” the vast majority of people can be unwittingly “swept along with the crowd.” In this manner, they are subtly diverted from their natural obligation to carefully examine all the issues involved, and to make decisions based on hard, documented facts. In an “educational” setting, these manipulators are known as “change agents” or “facilitators.”
As Albert Burns pointed out in a recent article, at meetings these people “appear to be acting as organizers, ‘allowing’ each person in the group to express their concerns about some program or policy under consideration. While this process is going on, people are urged to make lists and to form into task forces. The Facilitator carefully notes which members of the group are leaders, which are ‘loud mouths,’ and which may be easily swayed by different viewpoints.
“At a certain point, the previously friendly Change Agent begins to act as ‘devil’s advocate,’ becoming an agitator. The process involves playing one part of the group against another, the ‘divide and conquer’ technique. Anyone who is not clearly in accord with the Facilitator’s agenda is made to appear ridiculous, inarticulate, ignorant, or dogmatic. The idea is to make these members angry, thus escalating tension. The end object is to shut opposition voices out of the group. The ‘targets’ of such manipulation rarely, if ever, realize they are being manipulated. If they do suspect, they generally have no idea how to defeat the process.
“This method is being used at all levels of government to force meetings toward PRESET conclusions. There are three steps to defeat this process. They are simple to learn, if not always easy to put into practice since the Facilitators are well trained in agitation techniques.
“The first rule is: ALWAYS be charming, pleasant and courteous. Smile! Speak in a normal voice to avoid seeming to be belligerent and aggressive.
“Rule #2 is to STAY FOCUSED. Write your question or statement in advance to help you stay on track. These Change Agents are trained to twist the conversation around to make the questioner appear foolish or belligerent or aggressive. The idea is to put the questioner on the defensive. BE CAREFUL! As I mentioned in Rule 1, always be charming, pleasant and courteous (if it kills you to do it). Often an attempt is made to change the subject, digress or distort your intent. Always bring them back to the question you asked! If they distort your question into what amounts to an accusation of them, simply state clearly and precisely: ‘That is NOT what I stated, What I asked was...’ Here you repeat your original question. Do not be distracted or angered by the efforts to make you look bad.
“Rule #3. BE PERSISTENT! When the Facilitator realizes that putting you on the defensive is not going to work, quite often he or she will go into a long, drawn-out discussion of some unrelated or only vaguely related subject. Such a discussion may go on for a number of minutes. The intent being to have the crowd become bored and forget what the original question was. Let them run on, then very calmly, quietly with determination drag them back to the subject by saying, ‘But you didn’t answer my question! My question was...‘ (again repeat your question).
“Never, NEVER allow yourself to become angry. Anger directed toward the Change Agent makes him or her the victim. Their object is to become liked by the crowd, to be seen as a friend by the majority of those present, and to convince the majority that the ideas of the Facilitator are correct and acceptable...” [End of quotation]
Just to add a little more weight to what Albert Burns said in the above quotation, your editor believes that, when confronted by someone who is perceived to be attempting to gain the upper hand through coercion, harassment, or intimidation, one should always react to these professional bullies with a smile on their face and a twinkle in their eye. This has a devastating effect on those who are trying to control through bluff or intimidation. It calls their bluff and completely reverses their attempts at intimidation. If there are other people around, it shows the would-be manipulator up in their true light and adds to their humiliation. Such creatures are so accustomed to winning through intimidation that, when the tables are turned on them, it proves so psychologically disruptive that they often start screaming accusations or slink away with their proverbial “tail between their legs.”
As you go through life, remember that to be forewarned is to be forearmed.
SARAH PALIN
Some time ago your editor received a letter from a subscriber to Midnight Messenger. They were annoyed by the fact that we had published an article, An Alaska Fisherman’s “take” on Sarah Palin. The fisherman showed that he, like most Alaskans, was pleased with the way Governor Palin administered the affairs of that State while she was its chief executive officer. The writer didn’t believe we should give the former vice-presidential candidate any favorable publicity as it was undeserved. Interestingly, there is truth in both the “fisherman article” and the comments made by the subscriber.
While she was governor Sarah Palin did a good job, as was pointed out by the fisherman. His article didn’t say anything about what has occurred since that time. Nor did your editor.
Instead, we waited to see how Palin would perform on the national stage and in light of the very favorable publicity she has received since becoming “the darling of the Right.” We also wanted more information as to where Palin was “coming from” as far as her political agenda was concerned. Question. Have her actions since hitting the political “big time” matched her glowing rhetoric? Always remember, it is by their fruits and not only by their words that we can determine where someone is “coming from.” Actions always speak louder than words!
It now appears that, to use a Wizard of Oz analogy, the “behind the screen” controllers of the “republican” party recognized in 2007 that, to bolster their fast-fading credibility with members who were true constitutionalists and anti-new world order, they needed to do something bold to restore their “believability.” Knowing that the “fix was in” to put Barack Obama in the White House, and that the totally uninspiring John McCain was a certain loser, they decided to create a new republican “ idol” around whom most “conservatives,” “republicans,” and those on the “religious right” could rally. Popular Sarah Palin filled the bill perfectly. With grooming and widespread publicity, she could be used to further their nefarious agenda. As research has shown, in politics most people are swayed much more by rhetoric and “image” and “perception” than by reality. Voila, a new “conservative” star is born!
In actual fact there is little difference between the ultimate aims of the two main parties. As the late Dr. Carroll Quigley so accurately observed 44 years ago, “The argument that the two parties represent opposed ideals and policies ... is a foolish one.” The political reality is that the two parties “are almost identical, so that the American people can ‘throw the rascals out’ in any election without leading to any profound or extensive shifts in policy. The policies that are vital [to the hidden forces pulling strings behind the screen] are no longer subjects of significant disagreement, but are disputable only in details of procedure, priority, or method... These things any national party [or politician!] hoping to win a presidential election must accept” (Tragedy and Hope, 1966, p.1248).
When one grasps this basic political reality, they can at long last begin to understand that, as Gary Allen wrote nearly 40 years ago, “If we were merely dealing with the law of averages, half the events affecting our nation’s well-being should be good for America. If we were dealing with incompetence, our leaders should occasionally make a mistake in our favor. We are not dealing with coincidence or stupidity, but with planning and brilliance” (None Dare Call It Conspiracy, p.8).
Recognizing that Sarah Palin was probably “useable” and could prove a political asset on the national scene, neo-con William Kristol entered the scene. Kristol was a leading figure in The Project for the New American Century which, a decade earlier, laid out plans to grab control of the Middle East oil. In one of their documents, they said it might be necessary to orchestrate a “a catastrophic and catalyzing event” to achieve that objective. We all now know that the desired “catastrophic and catalyzing event” materialized in the tragic events of 9/11 — and the mysterious collapse of the Twin Towers and Building 7 in New York. At least 1,000 leading architects have now come forward to testify that these massive buildings couldn’t possibly have collapsed as described in the official government report. Each building was deliberately imploded by way of “controlled demolition.” When checked by a variety of highly reputable independent labs, significant amounts of Thermite particles were found in dust gathered at the scene of the crime. Thermite is probably the most devastating of modern explosives. It has an extremely hot reaction (up to 4,500 F) which creates molten iron and aluminum oxide. It pulverizes objects, turning them mostly to dust.
Interestingly, just weeks before 9/11 a New York developer, Larry Silverstein, leased the buildings for 99 years and had them heavily insured. Silverstein later collected $4,550, 000,000 ($4.55billion) in insurance money.
The “catastrophic and catalyzing” events of 9/11 triggered implementation of Bush’s phony “war on terror” and the already-written Homeland Security and Patriot Act legislation (which legislators were prevented from reading prior to their passage) that transformed American society overnight by effectively nullifying the Constitution and Bill of Rights. This was the same William Kristol who went to Alaska to check out Governor Palin, and to establish her possible “usefulness” to the powers-that-be. Having passed the neo-con test, Palin then had a private meeting with Henry Kissinger.
For decades Henry has been a top political “mover and shaker” on the world stage. As Richard Nixon’s National Security Advisor and then as U.S. Secretary of State, Kissinger, 86, stage-managed the Vietnam War debacle. He believed American troops to be “dumb, stupid animals to be used” as pawns for foreign policy (The Final Days, Bernstein, p.194).
And today? In “remarks” at the February 8, 2009, Munich Conference on Security Policy, U.S. National Security Adviser James L. Jones declared, “I take my daily orders from Dr. Henry Kissinger, filtered down through General Brent Scowcroft and Sandy Berger...” (CFR.org). He is one of those who decides who is “in” and who is “out.” Having vetted Palin, Kissinger cleared her as McCain’s running mate.
What is at the top of Kissinger’s list of priorities? Early last year he made a revealing statement about the worldwide financial crisis then unfolding. The “grave financial and international crises ... (and) the very unsettled nature of the international system generates a unique opportunity for creative diplomacy... An international order will emerge... [The low-water] “mark of the existing international financial system coincides with simultaneous political crises around the globe. Never have so many transformations occurred at the same time in so many different parts of the world. The alternative to a new international order is chaos” (International Herald Tribune, 1/12/09). To use the words of FDR, can anyone doubt “it was planned that way”?
In the lead up to the November elections, don’t be surprised if you see Palin stomping the nation gaining more and more confidence among the dumb “conservatives” and “fundamentalist Christian” sheep while corralling and directing them towards Henry Kissinger’s “new international order.”
In these perilous days, true Christians need to humble themselves before the One who is the real Shepherd — the One who is “The way, The Truth, and The Life” (John 14:6). He and he alone is the one before whom every knee shall bow and every tongue confess that Jesus Christ is Lord to the glory of God the Father (Romans 14:11; Philippians 2:10-11).
Best Wishes,
Des Griffin
|
