Des Griffin's Newsletter - July 2007
To subscribe: e-mail Des Griffin at alert@midnightmessenger.com
 Dear Friends:
Over the centuries a small number of books with ominous messages have emerged on the world scene. In spite of being dark and foreboding, and because each has had a major impact on world history, it helps us to have at least a working knowledge of them: These include, The Prince (1515), The Communist Manifesto (1848), and The Revolutionary Catechism (1869). Could there be yet another one of even greater importance?
In 1971 I was working for a Los Angeles area publisher, helping run a web press that poured out literally millions of magazines and/or booklets each month. At the time, I was also working on the notes for what would later become the opening chapters of my first book, Fourth Reich of the Rich. One day, one of my fellow workers somewhat furtively slipped me a rather lengthy document he had xeroxed. He indicated I might be interested in its contents.
That evening I opened up the envelope and, for the first time in my life, saw a copy of the book titled, The Protocols of the Elders of Zion. Each evening I would carefully read 5-10 pages, underlining or otherwise marking passages I deemed of particular importance. Soon I ended up with a document with so many Xs and underlinings, it was almost indecipherable.
The Protocols, I found, was a document divided into 24 sections (Protocols 1-24). These outlined an alleged plan by Jews (primarily Zionists) to systemically destroy sovereign national governments around the world. This, in turn, would create conditions that would ultimately lead to the creation of a global dictatorship headquartered in Jerusalem.
Being at that time an ardent millennialist and a supporter of a ministry the main focus of which was the spreading of a somewhat similar "gospel" (only one that substituted the name "Jesus Christ" for that of "the Jews"), I immediately sat up and took notice.
What immediately impressed me about the Protocols was the fact that many of the objectives outlined therein appeared - point-by-point - to be in the advanced stages of fulfilment (as of 1970). This was particularly true in the United States, Britain, and other English-speaking nations around the world. It seems so "unbelievable" as to be "obviously" untrue!
How, I wondered in amazement, could a document that had supposedly existed since the early 1900s be so spectacularly accurate on such a global basis. Initially, I concluded that the document just had to be a forgery, something that "couldn’t possible" have been written any earlier than, say, the 1940s or even the 1950s. It was, it seemed, just "too accurate" and "insightful" for there to be any other logical explanation..
Then I had an idea. Why not write the British Museum in London, asking about the origins of this document. Within a few weeks I received a reply: "The Library possesses the (Sergei) Nilus version of The Protocols of the Elders of Zion published in Russian in 1905 and purchased by the British Museum 10 August 1906."
This letter from the British Museum established that the document had in fact existed since at least 1905. Accepting this fact, we must view the world in the light of the predictions made in The Protocols as of at least 1905.
Over the last hundred years numerous charges have been leveled against any public figure who suggested that the Protocols could be genuine. Naturally, the numerous Jewish propaganda and promotion groups scattered across the nation and around the world zero in such people. Screaming on cue and in chorus, "believers" are branded as promoters of "rampant anti-Semitism," and as having a "virulent hatred of the Jews." As a result, "for fear of the Jews" most people are held in psychological bondage by the unseen but ever-present possibility of having such labels hung on them. After all, "what would people think" if they were branded with such a heinous label? In today’s politically correct but often mindless society, they would almost certainly be denounced as "hate criminals." Those deemed guilty of alleged "anti-Semitism" are treated with revulsion by a sin-sick, pathetically shallow society. Modern America, despite its intolerance of any thing not deemed "politically correct," takes great pride in its own perceived "tolerance." Thus, any one who might express an interest in examining the Protocols honestly and systematically in an effort to reach an honest assessment thereof, is sprayed with verbal venom so vigorously that most people are deterred from even considering the possibility of reading the book.
VICTOR MARSDEN
The document known as The Protocols was translated and divided into Articles and Paragraphs for easy reference by British journalist Victor Marsden. The translator declared later that he could not stand to work on the project for more than one hour at a time. The diabolical nature of the material he was obliged to turn into English made him positively ill.
When Victor Marsden wrote of "the diabolical nature" of this material he was certainly correct. As this author wrote more than thirty years ago, "The men who conceived the diabolical conspiracy as laid out in the Protocols were not atheists; they were members of the Illuminati, followers of the original ‘light bearer,’ Satan the Devil. They were worshipers of Satan. This is the plan of Satan" (Fourth Reich of the Rich, p.207).
EXCERPTS FROM THE PROTOCOLS
A few brief excerpts may help to illustrate the point: In Protocol #1, for example, we read, "Political freedom is an idea, not a fact. This idea one must know how to apply whenever it appears necessary for this bait of an idea to attract the masses of the people to one’s party for the purpose of crushing another who is in authority. This task is rendered easier if the opponent has himself been infected with the idea of freedom, so-called liberalism, and, for the sake of an idea, is willing to yield some of his power. It is precisely here that the triumph of our theory appears: the slackened reins of government are immediately, by the law of life, caught up and gathered together by a new hand, because the blind might of the nation cannot for a single day exist without guidance, and the new authority merely fits into the place of the old already weakened by liberalism...
"Whether the State exhausts itself in its own convulsions, (or) internal discord - it can be counted irretrievably lost. It is in our power...
"Is it possible for any sound logical mind to hope with any success to guide crowds by the aid of reasonable counsels and arguments, when any objection or contradiction, senseless though it may be, can be made and when such objections may find more favor with the people, whose powers of reasoning are superfluous? Man in masses and men of the masses, being guided solely by petty passion, paltry beliefs, customs, traditions and sentimental theorism, fall a prey to party dissension, which hinders any kind of agreement, even on the basis of a perfectly reasonable argument...
"The political has nothing in common with the moral. The ruler who is governed by the moral is not a skilled politician, and is therefore unstable on his throne. He who wishes to rule must have recourse both to cunning ... and to make-believe. Great national qualities, like frankness and honesty, are vices in politics, for they bring down rulers from their thrones more effectively and more certainly than the most powerful enemy. Such qualities must be the attributes of the kingdom of the goyim [Gentiles] but we must in no wise be guided by them...
"Our power in the present tottering condition of all forms of power will be more invincible than any other, because it will remain invisible until the moment it has gained such strength that no cunning can undermine it. Let us ... in our plans direct our attention not so much to what is good and moral as to what is necessary and useful. Before us is a plan in which is laid down strategically the line from which we cannot deviate without running the risk of seeing the labors of many centuries brought to naught."
In Protocol #2, we read, "The administrators, whom we shall choose from among the public, with strict regard for their capacities for servile obedience, will not be people trained in the art of government, and will therefore easily become pawns in our game in the hands of men of learning and genius who will be their advisers, specialists bred and reared from early childhood to rule the affairs of the whole world... The goyim ("human cattle") are not guided by practical use of unprejudiced historical observation, but by theoretical routine without any critical regard for subsequent results. We need not, therefore, take any account of them - let them amuse themselves until the hour strikes... Do not suppose for a moment that these statements are empty words...
Protocol #5: "We shall create an intensified centralization of government in order to grip in our hands all the forces of the community. We shall regulate mechanically all the actions of the political life of our subjects by new laws. These laws will withdraw one by one all the indulgences which have been permitted by the goyim, and our kingdom will be distinguished by a despotism of such magnificent proportions as to be at any moment and in every place in a position to wipe out any goyim who opposes us by deed or word.... Moreover, the art of directing masses and individuals by means of cleverly manipulated theory and verbiage, by regulations of life in common, and all sorts of other quirks, in all which the goyim understand nothing, belongs likewise to the specialists of our administrative brain... [I]n this species of skills we have no rivals....
"The principal object of our directorate consists in this: to debilitate the public the public mind by criticism; to lead it away from serious reflections calculated to arouse resistance; to distract the forces of the mind towards a sham fight of empty eloquence...
" In order to put public opinion in our hands we must bring it into a state of bewilderment by giving expression from all sides to so many contradictory opinions and for such length of time as will suffice to make the goyim lose their heads in the labyrinth and come to see that the best thing is to have no opinion of any kind in matters political...
There is nothing more dangerous than personal initiative; if it has genius behind it, such initiative can do more than can be done by millions of people among whom we have sown discord. We must so direct the education of the goyim communities that whenever they come across a matter requiring initiative they may drop their hands in despairing impotence... By this means we shall so wear down the goyim that they will be compelled to offer us international power of a nature that by its position will enable us without any violence gradually to absorb all the State forces of the world and to form a Super-Government..."
The above is just a minute sampling of the plans and objectives laid out in the 24 Protocols. They should give the reader a good idea of the overall picture presented in this remarkable document that has existed since the early 1900s.
At this point a number of questions arise: Are the Protocols genuine? Or, are they a forgery - or were some of them plagiarized from earlier documents as some claim?
As the fourteenth century proverb says, "The proof of the pudding is in the eating." Do the Protocols stand up to close scrutiny? And do their predictions directly parallel what has happened on the world scene over the last 100 years? The immediate answer to both questions is a resounding, Yes!
The simple truth is that the Protocols contained uncanny knowledge (as of at least 1905) of what was going to happen in subsequent years. To what can this be attributed? Mere happenstance, or diabolical design?
Without "powerful outside help of a spiritual nature," could anyone - or any group - have made, say, fifty predictions of a detailed nature and "hit the nail on investigation head" each time with almost perfect precision? The chances are so astronomical that any logical alternative can be automatically ruled out.
ARMY INTELLIGENCE DIVISION
In 1919, the United States Army Intelligence Division conducted an investigation and evaluation of issues generated by growing Jewish influence and power both domestically and worldwide. It was given "Secret" classification until 1973. Early on, the Report referred to the "Jewish Protocols (which) purport to be the official pronouncement of the program for world dominion drawn up by Theodore Herzl the founder of the modern Zionist movement and presented by him in 1897 to the inner circle of the first Zionist Congress in Basle, Switzerland. A summary of them was first published in 1905 by Serge Nilus was claims to have a copy stolen from the Zionist files in France."
Elsewhere, the Army Intelligence Report stated that "the American press is ... largely owned and controlled by the Jews. Witness the fact that the so-called Jewish Protocols which constitute by far the most serious charge against the Jews... have never been mentioned in any American publication other than the official Report of the Senate Judiciary Committee containing the testimony about the Protocols."
The Report goes on to document in detail Jewish participation in the then-developing world revolutionary movement. For example, "The early efforts of the Bolsheviki to get control in Russia were financed by (the) German Government, largely through the German Jewish banking firm of M.N. Warburg... Max Warburg, head of this firm, cooperating in this matter with his brother Fritz...." [It should be noted that yet another Warburg brother, Paul, was one of the founding members of the "Federal" Reserve System when it was created in 1913-14. The Fed is a privately-owned corporation which basically controls the affairs and policies of the United States. The setup was clearly outlined in the Protocols.
The Report quotes the London Morning Post (April 8, 1919): "[T]he Russian Bolsheviks were Jews. The Jews are at the present time in control of the Russian government and they have powerful friends in all the Allied countries who are helping them." All the socialist movements in European countries were all Jewish led. The same thing applies to the United States. Roosevelt’s socialist "New Deal" - which laid the foundation for the transformation of American from a Republic into a socialist welfare state - was so evident that it became widely known as the "Jew Deal."
SUPREME COURT IN JERUSALEM
These historical facts and subsequent world events are perfectly in line with similar predictions made by leading Jews. For example, Jewish Utopia, written by Rabbi Michael Higger in the 1930s, looks forward to a Jewish-controlled "Kingdom of Heaven" on earth - headquartered in Jerusalem. In 1962, in a short article for Look magazine, Israeli Prime Minister David Ben-Gurion declared that the United States was destined to become a "welfare state." He further predicted that "all armies will be abolished, and there will be no more wars. In Jerusalem, the United Nations (a truly United Nations) will build a Shrine of the Prophets to serve the federated union of all continents; this will be the seat of the Supreme Court of Mankind to settle all controversies among the federated continents, as prophesied by Isaiah...." (January 16, 1962, p.20). [This article is reproduced in Descent Into Slavery? p.210].
What are we to make of the Protocols, the mention of which, in recent decades has elicited nothing but howling screams about their being "hate literature" and "anti-Semitic propaganda"? As this writer wasn’t present when the Protocols were being formulated, or when they were allegedly presented to the first Zionist Congress in Basle, Switzerland, in 1897, he can’t vouch for their authenticity. One thing is sure, however. Whoever put them together had a high degree of supernatural help. That "help" may well have been Satanic (Luciferian) in nature. With this as a possibility, we should bear in mind that, early in his earthly ministry, Jesus was offered a similar kingdom ("all the kingdoms of the earth ... and the glory of them") if he would only "fall down and worship (Satan)" (Matthew 4:8,9). Bible students will remember that our Lord Jesus Christ declared that the Talmudic Jewish leaders of his day (the Pharisees) were "of (their) father the devil" (John 8:44). Could it be that the top leaders of Judaism (which "today traces its descent without a break through all the centuries from the Pharisees" - Jewish Encyclopedia, article on Pharisaism, p.666), could have accepted the same offer from the same source? If so, it is clearly Satanic in nature.
"Let God be true and every man a liar" (Romans 3:4).
Best Wishes, Des Griffin
|
